此外，由于译文质量是语言服务行业中评估翻译活动的重要指标,译后编辑与人

In addition, since translation quality is an important indicator for evaluating translation activities in the language service industry, the comparison of translation quality between post-translation editing and manual translation has always been a research hotspot. Some translators, especially professional translators, believe that the quality of the edited translation after machine translation is worse than that of manual translation (Y amada 50), which causes them to refuse to use machine translation. Foreign translation researchers have begun to compare the differences in translation quality between manual translation and machine translation post-editing, but existing research has also failed to reach a consistent conclusion. Fiederer and O'Brien (R. Fiederer and Sharon 0'Brien) found that the edited translation after machine translation scored higher in accuracy and conciseness, but lower in translation style (62-63). Li Jiajing and Liao Bosen (Jason Lee and Poson Liao) found that post-editing can reduce translation errors (106). Some studies have found that the quality of post-edited translation is equivalent to that of manual translation (Jia et al. 74-76; Screen 332-3 3). However, with the help of manual scoring, Depraetere et al. (Depraetere et al) found that the quality of the translation obtained by post-editing mode was lower (88-89).

In addition, as the quality of translation is an important indicator to evaluate translation activities in the language service industry, the comparison of translation quality between post editing and manual translation has always been a research hotspot. Some translators, especially professional translators, think that the translation quality of machine translation post editing is worse than that of manual translation (Yamada 50), which causes them to refuse to use machine translation. Foreign translation researchers have begun to compare the differences between manual translation and machine translation in terms of translation quality, but the existing studies have not reached the same conclusion. According to r. fielderer and Sharon 0'brien, MT post editing translation scored higher in accuracy and brevity, but lower in style (62-63). Li and Jason leeand Poson Liao found that post editing can reduce translation errors (106). Some studies have found that the quality of post editing translation is equivalent to that of manual translation (Jia et al. 74-76; Screen 332-3 3)。 However, with the help of manual scoring, depraetere et al. Found that the quality of the translation obtained by post editing mode was lower (88-89).<br>

In addition, because translation quality is an important index to evaluate translation activities in the language service industry, the comparison of translation quality between post-translation editing and manual translation has always been a research hotspot. Some translators, especially professional translators, think that the quality of the edited translation after machine translation is worse than that of manual translation (Y amada 50), which leads them to refuse to use machine translation. Foreign translation researchers have begun to compare the differences in translation quality between manual translation and post-translation editing of machine translation, but the existing studies have also failed to reach a consistent conclusion. Fiderer and O 'Brien found that the edited version after machine translation scored higher in accuracy and conciseness, but lower in translation style (62-63). Li Jiakun and JasonLeeandP oson Liao found that post-translation editing can reduce translation errors (106). Some studies have found that the quality of edited translation after translation is equivalent to that of manual translation (Jia et al. 74-76; Screen 332-3 3)。 However, with the help of manual scoring, Depraetere et al. found that the quality of the translated text obtained by post-translation editing mode was low (88-89).