对学生的科学论证能力进行评价，是探查学生学科能力及其进阶、考察相关课程

对学生的科学论证能力进行评价，是探查学生学科能力及其进阶、考察相关课程和教学的有效性的重要研究方向。在SSI 中论证是科学知识、科学方法、科学思维在复杂情境中的应用。<br>本研究以问卷的形式调查了定西市某中等职业学校的护理专业二年级184名中职生在社会性化学议题中的论证能力。研究结果显示：1.有95％的中职生在社会性化学议题中论证能力的总体水平是处于低论证能力水平，很少有学生能完成较为完整的论证过程，鲜有达到高论证水平的学生。2.中职生在社会性化学议题中论证能力的各个子能力水平中，提出主张维度和给出理由维度表现较好即可以构建出自己的论点，但依次在提出反论点维度、给出证据维度、给出支持性论点的得分中表现得越来越差。3.不同性别中职生在被调查的三个社会性化学议题中的论证能力总水平和在各个论证子能力水平上没有显著的差异。但是女生在调查问卷的总得分及各个议题的总得分均高于男生的得分，即女生的论证能力水平稍高于男生的论证能力水平。<br>根据调查结果，现今的中职生在社会性化学议题中的论证能力存在很大的提升空间，建议中职教育者们应重视化学教育中的论证教学，可在课堂中积极创设SSI教学情境，选择适当的教学模式和策略，重视在教学中培养提高中职学生的论证能力。

对学生的科学论证能力进行评价，是探查学生学科能力及其进阶、考察相关课程和教学的有效性的重要研究方向。 在SSI 中论证是科学知识、科学方法、科学思维在复杂情境中的应用。<br>本研究以问卷的形式调查了定西市某中等职业学校的护理专业二年级184名中职生在社会性化学议题中的论证能力。 研究结果显示：1.有95％的中职生在社会性化学议题中论证能力的总体水平是处于低论证能力水平，很少有学生能完成较为完整的论证过程，鲜有达到高论证水平的学生。 2.中职生在社会性化学议题中论证能力的各个子能力水平中，提出主张维度和给出理由维度表现较好即可以构建出自己的论点，但依次在提出反论点维度、给出证据维度、给出支持性论点的得分中表现得越来越差。 3.不同性别中职生在被调查的三个社会性化学议题中的论证能力总水平和在各个论证子能力水平上没有显著的差异。 但是女生在调查问卷的总得分及各个议题的总得分均高于男生的得分，即女生的论证能力水平稍高于男生的论证能力水平。<br>根据调查结果，现今的中职生在社会性化学议题中的论证能力存在很大的提升空间，建议中职教育者们应重视化学教育中的论证教学，可在课堂中积极创设SSI教学情境，选择适当的教学模式和策略，重视在教学中培养提高中职学生的论证能力。

Evaluating students'scientific proof ability is an important research direction to explore students' subject ability and its advancement, and to investigate the effectiveness of relevant courses and teaching. Demonstration in SSI is the application of scientific knowledge, scientific methods and scientific thinking in complex situations.<br>This study investigated the ability of 184 secondary vocational school students in grade two of nursing school in social chemistry topics in the form of questionnaires. The results show that: 1. The overall level of argumentation ability of 95% of secondary vocational school students in social chemistry issues is at a low level. Few students can complete a relatively complete argumentation process, and few students reach a high level of argumentation. 2. Vocational school students can construct their own arguments by putting forward advocacy dimension and giving reason dimension in each sub-competence level of argumentation ability in social chemistry issues, but in turn, they perform worse and worse in the scores of putting forward counter-argument dimension, giving evidence dimension and giving supportive argument. 3. there is no significant difference in the overall level of argumentation ability between three different social gender subjects in different gender. However, the total score of girls in the questionnaire and the total score of each topic are higher than that of boys, that is, the level of female students'argumentation ability is slightly higher than that of boys' argumentation ability.<br>According to the results of the survey, there is a great room to improve the argumentation ability of secondary vocational students in social chemistry issues. It is suggested that secondary vocational educators should attach importance to the argumentation teaching in chemical education, actively create SSI teaching situation in the classroom, select appropriate teaching modes and strategies, and attach importance to cultivating and improving the argumentation ability of secondary vocational students in teaching.<br>